Exactness of a pair #
For two maps
f : M → Nandg : N → P, withZero P,Function.Exact f gsays thatSet.range f = Set.preimage g {0}For additive maps
f : M →+ Nandg : N →+ P,Exact f gsays thatrange f = ker gFor linear maps
f : M →ₗ[R] Nandg : N →ₗ[R] P,Exact f gsays thatrange f = ker g
TODO : #
generalize to
SemilinearMap, evenSemilinearMapClassadd the multiplicative case (
Function.Exactwill becomeFunction.AddExact?)
When we have a commutative diagram from a sequence of two maps to another,
such that the left vertical map is surjective, the middle vertical map is bijective and the right
vertical map is injective, then the upper row is exact iff the lower row is.
See ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono in the file
Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Exact for the categorical version of this result.
Given an exact sequence 0 → M → N → P, giving a section P → N is equivalent to giving a
splitting N ≃ M × P.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Given an exact sequence M → N → P → 0, giving a retraction N → M is equivalent to giving a
splitting N ≃ M × P.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equivalent characterizations of split exact sequences. Also known as the Splitting lemma.
A necessary and sufficient condition for an exact sequence to descend to a quotient.
When we have a commutative diagram from a sequence of two linear maps to another,
such that the left vertical map is surjective, the middle vertical map is bijective and the right
vertical map is injective, then the upper row is exact iff the lower row is.
See ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono in the file
Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Exact for the categorical version of this result.
The linear equivalence (N ⧸ LinearMap.range f) ≃ₗ[A] P associated to
an exact sequence M → N → P → 0 of R-modules.
Equations
- h.linearEquivOfSurjective hg = LinearEquiv.ofBijective ((LinearMap.range f).liftQ g ⋯) ⋯